As the use of biometrics increases and governments look for ways to control the use of this technology, questions of privacy and surveillance surface. The risks are compounded by the lack of standards, adequate policy protections, ecosystem collaboration, and a general lack of awareness and understanding of biometrics. Once the technology leaves the realm of technologists, these questions will become public policy debates and questions of corporate responsibility.
Biometrics are fundamental elements of modern digital identity verification systems. As governments and service providers use biometrics to reduce fraud and other problems, the need for solid data protection is paramount. But this is also a difficult road to travel since biometric data is irreversible and cannot be reset by third parties.
Biometrics offers numerous advantages. Its security is enhanced by combining multiple factors, making it difficult for bad actors to duplicate or hack. It also creates less friction for end users. This makes biometrics a popular choice for companies in a variety of sectors. While biometrics is an increasingly popular technology, there are concerns that this new technology has the potential to undermine privacy. Busing biometric data can pose privacy risks, especially when the data is transferred to a central database. Those concerns are heightened because biometrics will soon extend far beyond human health. For instance, security researchers demonstrated that 3D printing could be used to compromise fingerprint scanning technology.
Biometrics has many advantages, but there are also ethical considerations. The first concern is that biometrics are not foolproof. The data may be compromised or misused by service providers or fraudsters. This data could be interconnected with other files or processed in ways not agreed upon by the citizen.
The second concern is the use of biometric data for commercial purposes. These systems would use biometric data to track and profile individuals. However, it is critical to understand such applications’ social and cultural contexts before implementing them. Failure to consider these issues can degrade the systems’ efficacy and lead to serious unintended consequences.
Biometric identification has many advantages, including increased security and convenience. But it also has several security and privacy risks. In addition to being difficult to hack, biometrics are hard to replicate by bad actors, which means they’re not easy targets. Furthermore, they reduce friction for the end user. These are the reasons why companies across various sectors are exploring biometric interfaces as an alternative to traditional authentication methods.
You can read this helpful blog if you want to know more about why many identity service providers still struggle despite the fact that the ethical biometrics high road should be easy to practice.